Thursday, May 19, 2005

Extremist Judicial Nominees Salon has a new article posted Friday listing the "extremist credentials" of seven Bush judicial nominees. Here's the article's first complaint: An assessment of the nominees' records suggests that all consider government regulation a central problem, while they view private enterprise and property a bedrock constitutional right. Meanwhile, a document a tad older than the Senate filibuster rules says: No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Would Salon's editors consider James Madison deserving of a straight up-or-down vote? - Amy Ridenour [Amy Ridenour's National Center Blog] 11:23:44 PM    comment [] trackback []

What American Would Support The Enemy? This one. Having no shame or integrity whatsoever, flip-flop Scott Ritter writes opinion pages for AlJazeera. His furtive imagination about what Bush is or is not doing is red meat for the unwashed socialist cool-aid drinking far left, who are awash in conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory that the dumbest man in the world has created. What? The point in making this post is not to give the jerk any traction. He discredited himself years ago. It's because you're not going to hear about it anywhere else. 9:37:45 AM    comment [] trackback []

© Copyright 2005 Ross Calloway. Last update: 11/27/2005; 8:40:33 PM.