Well, it isn't exactly a tour. But isn't it a 'timely' piece, what, after outing the terrorist financial tracking program, and the NSA program, now the al-New York Times publishes a cute 'tourist' piece of suburban Washington, DC. In it, they talk about some of this particular town's famous residents, like the Vice President and the Sec. of Defense. One of the two pictures in the cute tourist article is a shot of Sec. Rumsfeld's driveway, and btw, it helpfully (for who?) points out where a security camera is located. As the church lady would say, 'isn't that special?'
This business they call the New York Times, ought to have its license revoked or suspended for a few months to teach them a lesson that free speech doesn't include everything but the GPS coordinates for their homes. This paper uses the same lame excuse as der Slickmeister Bill Clinton, they do it because they can, with absolutely no regards for the consequences, from disgracing the office of the President to tipping off the world, including al-Qaeda, where they might find some prime targets. It's dangerous, reckless, and irresponsible.
Like I said here, if the New York Times is not the intelligence wing of al-Qaeda and terrorists around the world, how would their actions be any different if they were?
related: PowerLine Blog
4:14:31 PM  Google It!
|
|
AP - The White House countered a threatening message from Osama bin Laden on Saturday by accusing the al-Qaida leader of using the media to justify violence that is stalling the new Iraqi government's work to mend sectarian strife.
[
