| |
|
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
|
|
Iran's reply is, let's talk. It wasn't, OK, we'll stop refining uranium. Meanwhile, the talk & delay game that Saddam pulled off for years in the United Nations, is now engaged in Iran. Like Hezbollah, Iran is in building and re-arming mode, which is apparently the U.N.'s preferred method of negotiations. Especially when the offending party, Iran, calls the UN Security Council's so-called deadline of August 31, 2006 for Iran to stop enriching uranium as 'illegal' and 'worthless.' Starting from there, Iran can drag this out for years as long as they are calling the shots.
I don't know, maybe someone should check on Brian Ross, 'Chief Investigative Correspondent' at ABC. Iran's response turned out to be the usual talk & delay game of negotiations. And not the 'day of reckoning' he envisioned for the West.
12:08:11 PM 
|
|
Our Covert Enemies.
Michael Barone has long been known as a moderate, nuts-and-bolts observer of the political scene. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that only over the last few years, as Michael has observed the impotence--at best--of the Democratic Party in the face of existential threats to our civilization, has he come out as a conservative. In today's column he lays it on the line:
In our war against Islamo-fascist terrorism, we face enemies both overt and covert. The overt enemies are, of course, the terrorists themselves. ***
Our covert enemies are harder to identify, for they live in large numbers within our midst. And in terms of intentions, they are not enemies in the sense that they consciously wish to destroy our society. On the contrary, they enjoy our freedoms and often call for their expansion. But they have also been working, over many years, to undermine faith in our society and confidence in its goodness. These covert enemies are those among our elites who have promoted the ideas labeled as multiculturalism, moral relativism and (the term is Professor Samuel Huntington's) transnationalism.
[T]he default assumption of our covert enemies is that in any conflict between the West and the Rest, the West is wrong. That assumption can be rebutted by overwhelming fact: Few argued for the Taliban after Sept. 11. But in our continuing struggles, our covert enemies portray our work in Iraq through the lens of Abu Ghraib and consider Israel's self-defense against Hezbollah as the oppression of virtuous victims by evil men. In World War II, our elites understood that we were the forces of good and that victory was essential. Today, many of our elites subject our military and intelligence actions to fine-tooth-comb analysis and find that they are morally repugnant.
We have always had our covert enemies, but their numbers were few until the 1960s. *** They have propagated their ideas through the universities, the schools and mainstream media to the point that they are the default assumptions of millions. Our covert enemies don't want the Islamo-fascists to win. But in some corner of their hearts, they would like us to lose.
That is a very measured critique of a segment of our society that wields great power and wishes its own country great ill. I would only add that these liberals want us to lose, not just in some small corner, but with their whole hearts; in fact, our defeat is the only thing they whole-heartedly work for. [Power Line]
8:26:59 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2006 Ross Calloway.
Last update: 9/1/2006; 4:59:08 PM.
|
|
|
