As far as I'm concerned, if the path doesn't lead to a clear win on one side, and a clear loss for the other side, for however long it takes, and not a minute more, then it is most certainly 'cut-and-run.' You don't leave until you're finished. As a matter of fact, just over 60 days ago the Senate voted 87-13 to NOT pull out of Iraq on any kind of timetable. So it's not all Democrats who believe in cut-and-run, just the most vocal ones, the ones in leadership positions, not Joe Democrat in Podunk.
Dave says '[t]he Republican tactic of labeling Democrats as being for "Cut and Run" is disgusting, it's dishonest. . ,
I applaud exposing all, not just Republicans with CutAndRunNow.com, who may have A.D.D., or are too old to remember (or weren't paying attention in the first place) that war was declared on us over a decade ago. And that we didn't properly respond to it until the fall of 2001.
Nothing dishonest about going after terrorists and their sponsors, which is what we set out to do, and what we're doing now. If you don't want to finish the job, you might be seen as cut-and-run. That is not a Republican tactic, it is an observation as to the consequences of foreign policy and domestic security in Democrat hands.
Dave says 'I couldn't help myself, I had to buy CutAndRunNow.com. I'm going to put a Republican campaign site there, listing all the Republican quotes that come along that even hint of cutting and running. I expect an overflowing site. [Scripting News]
OK, we both seem to agree that cut-and-run policies do exist. That's progress. At least we're not calling it being patriotic any more.
1:51:20 AM 
|
|
